The revised plans for the Jacksons Wharf development have been rejected at a meeting of the plannign comittee at the town hall.
Thanks to residents, Peel Holdings will now have to go through an appeal process, perhaps taking 6 months. The general feeling was that the plans hadn’t changed sufficiently. A number of issues were addressed, such as the fact the building’s red sandstone would be more in keeping that other buildings in the area, and the building would not be higher that surrounding buildings. The scale was still considered an issue however, and the use of land for apartments rather than open use, although aspects of the open use of the land would improve.Few would like a derelict building to remain there, as nothing degrades an area and deters investment than a boarded up building, however after feedback from residents I would propose certain conditions were placed upon development there, if apartments are to be built at all.
If there is to be a residential building, my key requests would be:
· A significant and specific number of trees to be planted cited as a condition of approval, and significant green landscaping in front of the building that the public can use and enjoy as green space
· The use of a section of the building as a visitors centre and Castlefield museum
· A reduction in scale so buildings in Slate Wharf are not overlooked by a balcony/gallery, which many felt to be the least appealing aspect of the current scheme.
These are simply my ideas that may be most achievable, but please contact me and tell me what you think. I shall be speaking with the relevant figures at the developers and council to pass on these suggestions. When I spoke at the Castlefield residents meeting held recently at Dukes 92 I expressed my experience of other public spaces in other cities as being created by local tycoons, such as Wrigley in Chicago. Peel have already given over 3 acres of the 10 they own for public use and its been made clear it’s a dead-end to request more. Developers can easily cite the example of the city council approving apartment buildings on land the council owned in Castlefield (despite many public objections), and the selling off of public space to commercial interests in Piccadilly Gardens. Therefore a better use of our energy may be to get the best out of the site in terms of ’something for Castlefield’ and the local community with the 3 basic principals outlined above, but I am happy to campaign on your behalf if there is a consensus in another direction.
We all hear about planning conditions being placed upon new Tesco stores, such as new acess roads, trees, in-store crèches etc, so why not exercise some of the same thinking here?